San Mateo & Contra Costa County Court Delays
Like many other counties in California, San Mateo is suffering the effects from budget cuts and staff downsizing.The remaining clerks are handling double and triple the workload. Reduction of the workforce have lead to delays of 10-15 days in the 2 courts where misdemeanor cases are held. According to the clerks 10-15 days will be the usual expected turn around for the near future. Some files may take longer depending on circumstances. Meanwhile felony cases are taking 2-3 months to obtain from the clerk of courts.
Meanwhile, Contra Costa county is experiencing periodic delays in basic results
for searches submitted to the clerks. Prior to the changes, the clerks held the
searches a minimum of 24 hours. We are now experiencing minimum delays of 48 -72 hours.
Not consistently, but with greater frequency.
Thank you for your patience.
Fire Destroys Hancock County Courthouse
Sparta, GA Courthouse Fire Will Delay Court Records Indefinitely
As a result of a devastating fire at the Hancock County Courthouse in
Sparta, Georgia, criminal record research from the jurisdiction is
Court officials have advised of plans to provide public access terminals
at an alternate location. However, there is currently no estimated time-frame for when this access will be provided.
EEOC-FTC Guidebook for Background Checks
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Federal Trade Commission released a new guide to background checks for employers (consumer information tips for applicants and employees are also available). If you haven't seen the new guide, please take a look. It is a very interesting read and an invaluable resource for you. You can download a PDF copy here. As always, we try to keep up with our clients' needs so that we can serve you better.
IRC, Inc. has moved to new facilities. We have a new mailing address and phone and fax numbers. Please note these changes in your files.
P.O. Box 3345
Torrance, CA 90510
Phone: (866) 781-8160
Fax: (877) 784-7860
Thank You, we appreciate you business.
The EEOC rulings are based on TITLE VII of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. If there are specific takeaways from the EEOC Guidance, one of them would be to stress the importance of evaluating situations on an individual, case-by-case basis before making a hiring decision, rather than applying neutral, blanket approach policies. That is, you can't just have a policy that states that all applicants who have any prior convictions will be disqualified. There are always exceptions according to the EEOC's Guidance and certain industries are subject to Federal mandates requiring organizations to disqualify applicants with a specific conviction(s) in a certain specified number of recent years (i.e. banking and applicants with financial-or fraud-related convictions).
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
An employers approach should be to individually determine whether an applicants criminal history would have a bearing on his/her consideration for that position. These three items include: 1) the type and seriousness of the criminal conduct; 2) how much time has passed since the criminal conduct took place; and 3) the duties and responsibilities of the specific job.
CFPB New Regulations
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has exercised its regulatory authority by making a change to three notices required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, effective January 1, 2013.
The change directs consumers, furnishers and users of employee background checks to the CFPB instead of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and are part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub.L. 111-203. H.R. 4173) that was signed into law on July 21, 2010.
While the CFPB does not have supervisory authority over background checks, it does have rule making and enforcement powers over the FCRA.
CFPB has modified the following three forms:
Each of the three notices is mandated for use in certain situations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The "Summary of Consumer Rights under the FCRA" is a notice that a background screening firm must provide an employer and in turn, the employer must provide the notice to the applicant in specific situations.
The FCRA also mandates that a background screening firm (known as a Consumer Reporting Agency or "CRA") must provide each user (our clients) of its services the "Notice to Users of Consumer Reports of their Obligations under the FCRA".
The "Notice to Furnishers of Information of their Obligations under the FCRA" is aimed at certain furnishers of information to CRA's and must be provided in prescribed situations such as a re-investigation where the consumer disputes the report or in a situation involving identity theft.
The main difference between the old forms and the new forms is informing consumers that they may now obtain information about their rights under the FCRA from CFPB, instead of the FTC. To comply with the new law, employers and CRA's will need to stop using the old forms/notices by the start of 2013.
The new version of the "Summary of Rights" is uploaded on our secured site. You can locate this form in the Documents tab. Also, as always, Information Resources includes the "Summary of Rights" as part of the background check report when we find any derogatory information.
NORTH CAROLINA E-VERIFY REMINDER!
E-Verify legislation is being phased in gradually in North Carolina
according to the number of employees you have. October 1, 2012 is the
date by which the first group of employers that must enroll in
E-Verify. To remind, E-Verify is only to be used to confirm employment
authorization for new hires.
Effective Oct. 1, 2012—employers with 500 or more employees will be required to use E-Verify.
Effective Jan. 1, 2013—employers with 100 or more employees will be required to use E-Verify.
Effective July 1, 2013—employers with 25 or more employees will be required to use E-Verify.
The NC Department of Labor will begin accepting complaints against employers in accordance with the above effective dates.
BEWARE OF FAULTY BACKGROUND SCREENING COMPANIES!
In today's high-end unemployment, millions of people are out looking for jobs and many are being denied positions due to inaccurate and illegal information obtained in their criminal background checks. Much of this is due to new and inexperienced companies that do not know or follow laws and regulations of the FCRA. One of the problems in our industry is "companies" that take shortcuts and DO NOT perform the work.
What we have known for years is now coming to the attention of the public. Below is an article written by the Associated Press showing that the government is now examining background screening companies with little or no experience, please read......
WASHINGTON - Thousands of U.S. job hunters are losing out because employers use
faulty background-check data drawn from shoddy records, consumer
advocates say in a new report.
Those advocates want the government
to make sure people know what information prospective employers see, so
that errors can be corrected and abusive companies can be held
Use of criminal-background data is exploding as the
economy struggles back from the worst job crisis in decades, the
National Consumer Law Center says in the report, which is being released
today. To meet surging demand, countless dubious companies have
sprouted up, it says.
"It's the Wild West for background-screening
report companies," says Persis Yu, lead writer of the report. "They're
generating billions in revenue, but they have little or no
Nearly three-fourths of companies conduct
criminal background checks for some job applicants, according to a 2010
study by the Society for Human Resource Management. They buy
criminal-background data from providers of all sizes, including national
names like LexisNexis as well as upstarts that could include "anyone
with a computer, an Internet connection and access to records," the report says.
providers obtain information from online public records, private
vendors, jails and police blotters, it says. Sloppy handling of that
data can cause a search on one person to turn up a rap sheet about
someone with a similar name, for example.
Other common errors
include displaying criminal records that were supposed to be sealed or
wiped clean, misclassifying minor offenses as major crimes and listing
charges that have been dismissed.
IRC, Inc. is introducing NetCheck, a new service which provides employers with research of the internet and social networking sites.
Most companies place great importance, time and money to maintain a "good" image!
Your company expects employees to represent and promote a positive impression to your community.
As technology expands, social activities are now in the public eye more
than ever. Some people have articles listing positive contributions and
accomplishments, others may have some embarrassing situations.
IRC is offering this new service to provide insight on individuals and
to answer questions which normal background services cannot verify.
*SPECIAL PRICING: This new service is being offered at a discounted price for a limited time.